Feedback Exchange

Discuss what transition reallly looks like from the inside, moving from ending to neutral zone

It's my first draft, mostly looking for what's interesting, what you would want from the piece as a reader, what feels pedantic.

I'm not sure why I wrote this, but I felt a lot through all of this, and felt that because I felt a lot, there is a point to it. Maybe, I just wanted to share a real experience as a "mistress", the possibility for love, the conflicts, the mental struggles, and that not all mistresses follow the same script.

I can't tell if this is at all interesting - Let me know if any specific parts are interesting! I tried to cut a lot of details so the story is largely condensed and not too dry to read. Can you help highlight parts that feels slow/drag to read/repetitive that I can cut? Or any part that require more explanation? Curious if the piece flows. Any grammar/picky edits appreciated!

Trying to tell people what to do with AI. Most people are kickin g the tires, here is an opportunity to solve big problems - keeping it prescriptive

nothing specific

A philosophical critique of moral subjectivism—grounded in personal testimony, cultural commentary on the manosphere, and the thought of MacIntyre, C.S. Lewis, and Maximus the Confessor—arguing that the loss of shared moral framework produces not freedom but damage, in culture and in the individual.

Does the MacIntyre, Lewis, Maximus progression feel earned, or does it move too fast? Is there a point where the philosophy loses you? Where did you stop feeling it and start just reading it?

To reach a consensus on the path towards a healthy politics

Any kind of feedback would be greatly appreciated. My apologies for the length of this piece (much of quotations from the original Sophocles).

figure out what I think of claude code

curious what you think of the overall piece... boring parts? does the overall structure make sense? I'm pretty sure I will score low on "perspective" any ideas how to improve that? I have two candidate endings - not sure which one is better. Curious for thoughts

I just wanted to share something about the way people think, as someone that straddles both cultures.

As you read, does the flow makes sense - which part is interesting, which is confusing, redundant/can cut, any questions you have? Is it clear what I'm trying to convey?

The goal is to walkthrough my thought process around Essay Architecture. What form is it, and is there a precedent for how I want to operate it? I'm calling it a micro-institute, and it's something like the inverse of the one-person unicorn idea (using leverage for impact, not profit).

No need to leave detailed feedback. Would love for you to give it a general read and then answer: 1) favorite part, 2) worth cutting, 3) open questions, 4) does it need an intro?

Untie the misconception that natural selection pushes you to be the fittest. Underscore the massive impact that chance has on our lives. Push that this lack of overall control we have should not get us to forgoe ownership over our actions, but should instead instill in us a peace.

Looking for feedback on clarity, depth, and cohesion. Where are you confused? Where are you excitedly interested and want more? Is something missing? Are there any places where too much is said or where additional ideas are unnecessarily brought in?

n/a

n/a

Two feelings: recognition that gives way to being unsettled.

Feedback notes are at the top of the doc.

Articulate why being taken seriously matters more than praise — and why it’s unsettling that an AI now provides that experience more reliably than many human collaborators ever did.

its a super quick draft... I dictated it and cleaned it up... curious if anything is interesting about it, ideas on what to cut and what to expand

Show how our common perceptions of evolution being about how well adapted something is are backwards, and show how this dominance of chance relative to skill should not make us nihilistic

This is the first draft of two different pieces. I'm trying to write my first long form piece of the year. Both of these have overlap so I don't know whether to combine them, publish them separate, or pick one. So would love advice on that. I've been getting stuck writing first drafts and then throwing them out when I get stuck. I would love ideas for expansion, ways to drive it deeper, make it more interesting, questions you have while reading it, other ways of talking about or structuring the pieces.

Start a conversation

Any kind of thoughts or impressions - this link is only to the first part of the essay

I am trying to write more personal stories

flow and imagery, ideas to expand

This is my first essay of the year, and the one I'll post before sharing the essay prize results. I want to set a frame to let readers know I'm thinking about the project. I think a micro-institute is a helpful term/model that could inspire others.

I'm happy with the opening frame (Elon's xAI essay prize, as contrast), but the ending falls flat for me. Should I say more about micro institutes once I introduce them? Any other thoughts on how to end? (was thinking to explain my mission, why the essay, but it's feeling off). Any questions you think as you read would be helpful!

A quick note I wrote to myself. There's probably a lot more I could say, for example: how sleep deprivation was a status signal in architecture school, Buckminster Fuller's and Davinci's polyphasic sleep experiments, the role of dreams, and a future where pills might reduce the need to sleep.

Is this worth contuing down? Feels like it's a fun topic with lots of potential angles to explore. Still not sure if this should be a quick Note or a larger essay. What would be helpful: what questions pop up for you? What is your relation to sleep/sleep deprivation?

I'm trying to discern what political rule by women means for our lives.

Any feedback is welcome

I'd like to explore the gray area of love between romantic and friendly.

What can I add to the piece from a cultural perspective to achieve my goal?

I am trying to figure out if there is a role for design and design education in the age of ai and if so what it looks like

I don't think this would diagram very well! I wonder if it hangs together or if there are some ideas I should save for another essay? Design essays are always hard for me to publish because so much of my identity is wrapped up in trying to be a designer and when I try to write about it I feel like I still don't really know what it is. I feel vulnerable!

I don't know if it has a goal beyond my reflection on my practice of making music... I guess it is to inspire people to think about the value of art in the world

Anything confusing in here? Areas to refine? I am curious if it is obvious to anyone how I could integrate different perspectives instead of only 1st person